The laterolog was put into service in , predating the induction log by 6 or 7 years, Logarithmic scales appeared for the dual laterolog and later tools to. Dual laterolog resistivity measurements; Laterolog anomalies; Azimuthal dual laterologs. 2 Array electrode tools; 3 Shallow focused. Description. The QLDLL3 Dual Laterolog tool provides a time multiples dual spacing focused resistivity measurement with two different.

Author: Meztill Vicage
Country: Zimbabwe
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Marketing
Published (Last): 9 February 2004
Pages: 459
PDF File Size: 7.79 Mb
ePub File Size: 5.93 Mb
ISBN: 671-2-55014-850-9
Downloads: 75101
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tezuru

The Baker Atlas high-definition lateral log HDLL tool [10] acquires 8 potential and 16 first differences, and computes 14 second differences.

When the GVR tool is positioned directly above the bit, the resistivity measurement has a resolution of approximately 2 ft [61 cm], which is usually adequate for “geostopping”—stopping drilling precisely at casing or coring depths.

In practice, both modern laterolog and induction-logging tools are suitable for most logging conditions, and it is no longer practical to make a duak recommendation for one type in preference to the other, except in extreme conditions. Mud resistivity and tool standoff are also measured.

Use this section to provide links to relevant material on websites other than PetroWiki and OnePetro. Laterolog tools are resistivity devices, which are most accurate in medium- to high-resistivity formations. The current is injected into the casing and returns lateeolog an electrode in the earth some distance from the casing. Despite the apparent paradox of measuring formation resistivity through the highly-conductive steel casing, tools are now available that can measure the formation resistivity to considerable accuracy.

Because it has no bridle, it does not suffer from Groningen effect. For normal devices Fig. Cased-hole resistivity is becoming accepted for applications including contingency logging, reservoir monitoring, ltaerolog evaluation of old producing wells.

Both the measure current and measure voltage V 0 are varied latrrolog measured, but their product power I 0 V 0 is kept constant.

Because the borehole is generally more conductive than the formation, the current tends to stay in the mud, and the measurement responds primarily to the volume of mud in front of each duak electrode.

Borehole and shoulder effects are minimized by the use of laterolog-style focusing. The resulting operation of the azimuthal array has no effect on the LLd and LLs measurements.

This creates a negative potential at the far reference electrode used as the potential reference for the laterolog measurement.

Dual Laterolog Service | HLS Asia Limited | Manufacturer in Sector 57, Noida | ID:

The separation is not a clear function of invasion, but is also a function of bed thickness. Two voltage—measuring electrodes M and N on the sonde approximated the measurement of a constant-voltage spherical shell around the injection electrode. The Schlumberger DLL has a modified-geometry measurement that can also be recorded.


Most of the current returns to the A2 electrode near the azimuthal array. The inversion process begins with the raw data input and an initial estimate of a parametric model describing the formation resistivity distribution.

The measurements are taken while the tool is stationary and take approximately a minute per station. In addition, the current from each azimuthal electrode is focused passively by the currents from its neighbors.

This article discusses the types of resistivity logging devices that rely on electrodes. In practice, N or B may be placed in the hole at a large distance above A and M [the voltage measured is practically the potential of M because of current from Areferred to an infinitely distant point]. If automatic corrections are not available, log-interpretation charts provided by the service company are used to manually correct the log readings for these influences.

LLd and LLs curves, with a very shallow resistivity measurement that reads R xo directly, may be sufficient. Auxiliary measurements are made that are very shallow, with current paths close to the tool.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. The apparent resistivities RLA1 through RLA5 are all sensitive to the formation, becoming progressively deeper in investigation. Resistivity logging probes involves the injection of electrical current through a current electrode and measurement of the voltage drop at a potential electrode after passage through the rock.

Laterolog and induction logging tools each have unique characteristics that favor their use in specific situations and applications.

The azimuthal resistivity measurements are sensitive to tool eccentering in the borehole and to irregular borehole shape.

Thousands of them were run each year all over the world. The inherent vertical resolution is sharper—24 in.

Dual Laterolog Service

The six modes are focused by a combination of hardware and software focusing. The data are usually stored downhole for later retrieval, although a compressed image and selected button data may be transmitted to the surface in real time together with the ring and bit resistivities and gamma-ray measurements. All laterolob the measurements are combined in the equation. Many charts called departure curves were published to aid in interpretation of the ES logs.

These are used as inputs to a 2D inversion to solve for formation resistivities. The “geometric factor” relates the effect of a portion of formation on the logging tool reading to its position relative to the tool in an infinite homogeneous medium. Since then, new logging methods have been developed to measure values much closer to R xo and R t.


Dual Laterolog Tool (EDLT) | LandSea – Open Hole and Cased Hole Logging Systems

The dual focussed laterolog is an electrical probe with a short and long electrode measuring different rock volumes away from the borehole. This leakoff current forms the basis for the CHFR measurement. The most recent development in electrode tools is the array laterolog or array lateral tools. The intermediate measurements are used to derive the radial-invasion profile. The inversion process is initiated by using the shallow measurements associated with short-spacing sensors to identify and evaluate the shallow-formation resistivity structure.

The button measurements are radial, acquiring azimuthal resistivity profiles as the tool rotates in the borehole. The high-resolution LLhr curve reads almost as deeply into the formation as a deep laterolog LLd curve, particularly when R yo is less than R t.

Although most of the current returns through the casing, some small fraction of it will leak off from the outside of the casing and will return through the earth. This tool is called the “inverse,” and dusl records the same resistivity values as the lateral by reciprocity.

Low-impedance circuits measure the current at each button electrode, and the axial current flowing down the collar is measured at the ring electrode by the ring monitor toroid and at the lower transmitter by the lower monitor toroid. Therefore, when R xo is greater than R tan induction tool is preferred for R t determination because laterolog tools will be affected mostly by R xo.

The Schlumberger cased-hole formation resistivity CHFR tool has three sets of four arms that contain electrodes that are forced into contact with the inside of the casing.

Electrode resistivity devices

The distance AO is the spacing of the lateral device. Laterolog devices see the more resistive zones, and induction tools see the more conductive zones. This requirement results in the ft [8.