Section 1 is the Introduction to this volume. Section 2 .. These DoDAF data groups support both DoDAF viewpoints and the DoD key processes: the Joint. DoDAF Volume 2 describes the technical aspects of data collection presentation descriptions and DoDAF-described Models in Volumes 1 and 2 provide guidance DoDAFV is intended to be methodology agnostic. DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for . OV-1 High Level Operational Concept Graphic: High level graphical and .. DoDAF V · Printable version of DoDAF V Volume 1 · Printable version of DoDAF V Volume 2.
|Published (Last):||17 December 2009|
|PDF File Size:||12.60 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.15 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Department of Defense Architecture Framework
One concern about the Volumw is how well these products meet actual stakeholder concerns for any given system of interest.
Only a subset of the full DoDAF viewset is usually created for each system development. It addressed the Deputy Secretary of Defense directive that a DoD-wide effort be undertaken to define and develop a better means and process for ensuring that C4ISR capabilities were interoperable and met the needs of the warfighter. The figure represents the information that links the operational view, systems and services view, and technical standards view.
In addition to graphical representation, there is typically a requirement to provide metadata to volme Defense Information Technology Portfolio Repository DITPR or other architectural repositories.
TRAK Community :: Wiki :: DODAF
Otherwise there is the risk of producing products with no customers. In simpler terms, integration is seen in the connection from items common among architecture products, where items shown in one architecture product such as sites used or systems interfaced or services provided should have the identical number, name, and meaning appear in related architecture product views. The DoDAF provides doddaf foundational framework for developing and representing architecture descriptions that ensure a common denominator for understanding, comparing, and integrating architectures across organizational, joint, and multinational boundaries.
The repository is volkme by the common database schema Core Architecture Data Model 2. Integrated architectures are a property or design principle for architectures at all levels: The relationship between architecture data elements across the SV to the OV can be exemplified as systems are procured and fielded to support organizations and their operations. The DoDAF deskbook provides examples in using traditional systems engineering and data engineering techniques, and secondly, UML format.
There are many different approaches for creating an integrated architecture using DoDAF and for determining which products are required. It establishes data element definitions, rules, and relationships and a baseline set of products for consistent development of systems, integrated, or federated architectures.
The approach depends on the requirements and the expected results; i. SV products focus on vilume physical systems with dodxf physical geographical locations. The concept of capability, as defined by its Meta-model Data Group allows one to answer questions such as:.
The Department of Defense Architecture Framework DoDAF is an architecture framework for the United States Department of Defense DoD that provides visualization infrastructure for specific stakeholders concerns through viewpoints organized by various views.
Definitions and Guidelines”, “II: These views relate to stakeholder requirements for producing an Architectural Description. Node is a complex, logical concept that is represented with more concrete concepts.
DoD weapons and information technology system acquisitions are required to develop and document an enterprise architecture EA using the views prescribed in the DoDAF. In this manner, the DM2 supports the exchange and reuse of architectural information among JCAs, Components, and Federal and Coalition partners, thus facilitating the understanding and implementation of interoperability of processes and systems.
DoDAF has a meta-model underpinning the framework, defining the types of modelling elements that can be used in each view and the relationships between them. While it is clearly aimed at military systems, DoDAF has broad applicability across the private, public and voluntary sectors around the world, and represents one of a large number of systems architecture frameworks.
As one example, the DoDAF v1. To facilitate the use of information at the data layer, the DoDAF describes a set of models for visualizing data through graphic, tabular, or textual means. Each view depicts certain perspectives of an architecture as described below.
Retrieved from ” https: This page was last edited on 3 Vodafat DoD Business Systems Modernization: All view AV products provide overarching descriptions of the entire architecture and define the scope and context of the architecture. It broadened the applicability of architecture tenets and practices to all Mission Areas rather than just the C4ISR community. In April the Version 1. The developing system must not only meet its internal data needs but also those of the operational framework into which it is set.
Views Read Edit View history. The DM2 defines architectural data elements and enables the integration and federation of Architectural Descriptions. Department of Defense for developing enterprise architecture has been debated:.
Each of these three levels of the DM2 is important to a particular viewer of Departmental processes:.
The actual sequence of view generation and their potential customization is a function doadf the application domain and the specific needs of the effort. United States Department of Defense information technology Enterprise architecture frameworks. This Architecture Framework is especially suited to large systems with complex integration and interoperability challenges, and it is apparently unique in its employment of “operational views”. It establishes a basis for semantic i.
Ddoaf document addressed usage, integrated architectures, DoD and Federal policies, value of architectures, architecture measures, DoD decision support processes, development techniques, analytical techniques, and the CADM v1. As the DM2 matures to meet the ongoing data requirements of process owners, decision makers, architects, and new technologies, dkdaf will evolve to a resource that more completely supports the requirements for architectural data, published in a consistently understandable way, and will enable greater ease for discovering, sharing, and reusing architectural data across organizational boundaries.
Technical standards view TV products define technical standards, implementation conventions, business rules and criteria that govern the architecture. A capability thread would equate to the specific activities, rules, and systems that are linked to that particular capability.