A Rulebook for Arguments has ratings and reviews. Kirstine said: If you want to be good at arguing, this book is for you. I read it all in one. A Rulebook for Arguments is a succinct introduction to the art of writing and assessing arguments, organized around specific rules, each illustrated and. Short Arguments: Some General Rules Arguments begin by marshaling reasons and organizing them in a clear and fair way. Chapter I offers general rules for.
|Published (Last):||21 November 2016|
|PDF File Size:||15.77 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.31 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Reasoning in Epistemology categorize this paper. This could be effective fir a class or prolonged study of this material, but I’m not sure I would recommend it beyond a ruleebook school level and, at the same time, I’m not sure I would recommend it to high school students either because of the content of some of Meh.
Stephen de Wijze – – Educational Philosophy and Theory 35 1: I read it all in one go, and that’s a bit counter-productive, seeing as you won’t be able to remember all of it unless you’re crazy smart, in which case, you probably don’t need this book. It’s concise and easy to read. A compilation of great tips and examples to make your points. I read this book in two extended sittings with indepth study, because the book is two in one.
This is a rulebook as the title suggests, but it is concise and readable.
A Rulebook for Arguments (Fourth Edition) – Anthony Weston – Google Books
Account Options Sign in. The examples I run into the most: Unlike most textbooks on argumentative writing, Rulebook is organised around specific rules, illustrated and explained soundly and briefly. Logic and Rhetoric in England, This small book acts as wedton guide on how to make good arguments in writing.
Anthony Weston created an indispensable handbook here. Criticisms and suggestions, as always, are welcome. Rulbeook may be a good book if you know nothing about logic or argumentation, but for most people, I think it’s too simpl It’s an ok resource to have, has the most important information needed and it’s quite concise. I took some notes.
Jul 16, Emily rated it liked it Shelves: Author Weston, Anthony, Edition 4th edition. Rather, argument refers to reasoning and rhetoric. None of your libraries hold this item.
Its antjony is one aspect of its value. From starting with premises, testing rulevook, considering multiple perspectives, different types of evidence, and logic. It is not a mistake to have strong views. Windsor Musson – – [Bognor Regis, Eng. The author does also give some sources for larger works if the reader is interested.
Skills for Critical Understanding and Writing. If you’re looking for a way to make sure you never lose an argument again, this is not the book for you.
A rulebook for arguments [electronic resource] / Anthony Weston. – Version details – Trove
Trivia About A Rulebook for Ar Interestingly, I would contest the logic of some of the examples that Weston uses in this book. It also explains types of deductive arguments which I got a brief introduction to through CrashCourse Philosophy, but this book goes into a lot more detail.
Wilbur Samuel Howell – – Princeton: This 85pg book accomplished much of its aim: Find it on Scholar. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. The fourth edition offers a revamped and more tightly focused approach to extended arguments, a new chapter on oral arguments, and updated examples and topics throughout. Its info is too basic for older students and its content invites problems with younger students.
Unlike most textbooks on ar Updated examples, streamlined text, and the chapter on definition reworked in a rule-based format strengthen this already strong volume. Science Logic and Mathematics. Problems with Teaching the Ad Hominem Fallacy.
Dec 12, Todd Cambio rated it really liked it. Sign in Create an account. Fog 06, Steve Traves rated it it was amazing. Feedback improves your logic too. This widely popular primer—translated into eight languages—remains the first choice in all disciplines for writers who seek straightforward guidance about how to assess arguments and how to cogently construct them.
A Theory of Legal Reasoning.
Oct 05, Martin Stoev rated it it was amazing Shelves: Tags What are tags? You may even pick up a dew new facts or examples. But it is definitely useful, and works very well as a, well, rulebook for arguments. The sob stories ‘appealing to pity as an argument for special treatment.
A Rulebook for Arguments
You can refer to a section and quickly refresh your memory about some concept. Oral Arguments Appendix I. No forms of cognitive bias were included. Jul 23, Vel Veeter rated it liked it Shelves: It may be a good book if you know nothing about logic or argumentation, but for most people, I think it’s too simple to learn anything significant.